Skip to content

Cookie Compliance: Valid Consent, Not Just a Banner

Cookie audit, Consent Management Platform implementation, LSSI-CE compliance, and ePrivacy Regulation preparation for websites and digital platforms.

120+
Cookie and consent audits completed
Zero
AEPD sanctions on clients with correctly implemented CMPs
12 months
Maximum recommended consent renewal period
4.8/5 on Google · 50+ reviews 25+ years experience 5 offices in Spain 500+ clients
Deadline Already mandatory

GDPR/ePrivacy compliance

The AEPD has sanctioned 200+ websites in 2024-2025 for invalid cookie consent

Quick assessment

Does this apply to your business?

Does your cookie banner have a Reject all button as visible as the Accept all button, in the first layer of the banner?

Have you conducted a technical cookie audit in the last six months to verify no third-party cookies fire before user consent?

Does your CMP log the date and type of each user's consent, so you can demonstrate it to the AEPD in an inspection?

Is your Google Analytics and Google Ads implementation compliant with Consent Mode v2 and the AEPD Cookie Guidelines?

0 of 4 questions answered

Our approach

Our cookie compliance audit and remediation process

01

Technical cookie and tracker audit

We scan the website or application to identify all active cookies and trackers, classify them by category (essential, functional, analytical, advertising), and map the third-party providers involved.

02

Compliance analysis and gap report

We assess the current consent system against the AEPD Cookie Guidelines (2023): consent validity, ease of rejection, layered information, and cookie policy completeness.

03

CMP implementation or reconfiguration

We configure or implement the Consent Management Platform with the settings required for valid consent: equivalent rejection option, consent logging, and periodic renewal.

04

Documentation and maintenance

We draft or update the cookie policy with the complete tracker catalogue and detailed purposes, and establish a periodic review process for new cookies or platform changes.

The challenge

The AEPD's Cookie Guidelines require that consent for non-essential cookies be free, specific, informed, and unambiguous. Banners with a more prominent Accept button than Reject, rejection options buried in configuration menus, or the absence of an equally easy way to decline are documented violations the AEPD is actively sanctioning. Many companies believe they comply because they have a banner. Most do not meet the valid consent standard.

Our solution

We conduct a full technical cookie audit, design the consent architecture in line with the AEPD's Cookie Guidelines, implement or configure the Consent Management Platform (CMP), and document the cookie policy at the level of detail the regulation requires. For digital advertising and advanced analytics platforms, we design compliance strategies that do not sacrifice measurement.

Cookie compliance in Spain is governed by Article 22(2) of Law 34/2002 on Information Society Services and Electronic Commerce (LSSI-CE), read in conjunction with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR, Regulation 2016/679) and the AEPD's Cookie Guidelines (updated 2023). Non-essential cookies — including analytics, advertising, and social media cookies — require prior, freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous consent before being placed on a user's device; consent obtained through dark patterns (such as a more prominent "Accept" button, or rejecting cookies buried in configuration menus) does not meet the legal standard. The forthcoming ePrivacy Regulation will replace the LSSI-CE cookie provisions at EU level.

Cookie compliance is the area of data protection where the largest gap exists between how businesses perceive their position and the regulatory reality. A cookie banner on a website is not compliance — it is the starting point of a system that, to be valid, must ensure that the consent obtained meets all the requirements of the GDPR and the AEPD’s Cookie Guidelines.

The AEPD’s updated 2023 Cookie Guidelines set concrete criteria that many current implementations do not meet. The equivalence requirement — that accept and reject options must be equally prominent and accessible in the first layer of the banner — generates the most violations. The common practice of placing an Accept all button on the first layer and making rejection available only through a settings link buried in secondary navigation is expressly contrary to the AEPD guidelines and has resulted in sanctions in recent enforcement decisions.

The technical cookie audit also regularly reveals situations organisations were unaware of: third-party scripts loading before the user has interacted with the banner, cookies setting regardless of the option chosen, or advertising trackers active that the technical team had forgotten and that do not appear in the cookie policy. This technical opacity generates the greatest regulatory risk, because it means the recorded consent does not correspond to the actual processing being carried out.

For companies with advanced digital marketing strategies, cookie compliance does not have to mean abandoning measurement. The correct implementation of Google Consent Mode v2, combined with a properly configured CMP, allows useful conversion measurement to be maintained even when a portion of users rejects cookies — using Google’s data modelling for non-consent sessions. This compliance architecture is what allows businesses to balance the regulatory obligation with the data needs of commercial decision-making.

The pre-consent blocking of third-party scripts is the critical technical control that separates a functioning CMP from a cosmetic one. A banner that records user preferences but fails to block the underlying scripts before consent — a common failure in CMP implementations — provides no actual protection and is easily detected in a technical inspection. We verify the full technical implementation, not just the visual appearance of the consent interface.

A correctly implemented cookie compliance system delivers zero AEPD sanctions for clients who maintain it properly. The combination of a technical audit, a correctly configured CMP, and documented consent records is the evidence that regulators look for and that our clients have consistently demonstrated. In the broader context of GDPR compliance, cookie compliance is the most visible interface of a company’s privacy commitment — the one users experience directly and the one supervisory authorities inspect most easily. Our external DPO service provides ongoing oversight to maintain compliance as platforms and regulations evolve.

Preparing for ePrivacy and the Regulatory Road Ahead

The ePrivacy Regulation has been delayed repeatedly, but its eventual entry into force will require material changes to consent systems, electronic communications metadata handling, and digital advertising rules. Organisations that build their consent infrastructure correctly now — with a well-structured CMP, documented consent records, and a modular architecture — will adapt far more easily when the Regulation finally applies. Privacy by design integration ensures cookie compliance does not operate in isolation from your broader privacy framework.

Track record

Real results in cookie compliance

We thought our cookie banner was standard. BMC's technical audit found 23 third-party cookies firing before consent, and a reject button buried three layers deep in settings. Fixed in four weeks. We have had no AEPD issues since.

Iberian Media Group S.A.
Head of Digital Marketing

Experienced team with local insight and international reach

What you get

What our cookie compliance service includes

CMP Implementation

Configuration or implementation of the Consent Management Platform in compliance with AEPD requirements, including consent logging and pre-consent blocking of third-party scripts.

ePrivacy Regulation Readiness

Impact analysis of the forthcoming ePrivacy Regulation on the consent system and a roadmap for adaptation when the Regulation enters into force.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about cookie compliance in Spain

Only strictly necessary cookies — those indispensable for the service explicitly requested by the user — are exempt from consent. This includes session cookies, authentication cookies, security cookies, and user preference cookies where they are strictly required. All others require prior, informed consent: analytics cookies (Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics), advertising cookies, social media cookies, and performance measurement cookies must not be set before the user actively consents.
The AEPD requires consent to be: free (no penalty for the user who rejects), specific (separately for each purpose), informed (the user knows what they are consenting to and why), and unambiguous (a positive action — never a pre-ticked box or consent by continued browsing). Rejection must be as easy as acceptance: if there is an Accept all button, there must be a Reject all button at the same level of visibility in the first layer of the banner.
No, under the AEPD Cookie Guidelines. Google Analytics sets analytics cookies requiring prior consent. Some implementations using Consent Mode v2 with IP anonymisation reduce the data collected when users do not consent, but do not eliminate the need for consent for full analytics cookies. Cookieless analytics (server-side tracking with anonymised data) can be a consent-free solution for some measurement purposes.
Google Consent Mode v2 is a technology that allows Google to adjust cookie and tag behaviour based on user consent status. When the user does not consent, Google uses conversion modelling rather than actual data. Implementing Consent Mode v2 is necessary for correctly using Google Ads and Analytics products, but it does not replace the obligation to obtain valid consent — the banner and CMP remain required and must comply with AEPD requirements.
The AEPD recommends periodic renewal, as a general rule every 12 months at most if no changes have occurred. If new cookies are added or the purposes of existing ones change, consent must be renewed earlier. The CMP system must record the date of each user's last consent to manage automatic renewal.
No. If the user has not consented, no cookie requiring consent may be set, regardless of whether it is first-party or third-party. The CMP must block all third-party scripts until the user grants consent. Modern CMP solutions can block Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and other provider scripts until the user accepts.
The ePrivacy Regulation will replace the ePrivacy Directive (transposed in Spain as the LSSI-CE) and will directly regulate cookies, electronic communications, and privacy in the digital environment across the EU. Its adoption has been repeatedly delayed; the latest projections point to 2025-2026. When it enters into force, it will introduce changes to the cookie consent framework that businesses will need to implement. We monitor legislative developments and prepare your systems for the transition.
Yes, actively. The AEPD has imposed significant sanctions for cookie violations: banners that do not allow rejection as easily as acceptance, missing cookie policies, cookies installed before consent is obtained, and dark patterns in banner design. Sanctions range from warnings to fines of tens of thousands of euros for mid-sized companies, and hundreds of thousands for large operators. The AEPD regularly publishes its criteria and resolutions, which we integrate into our compliance frameworks.
First step

Start with a free diagnostic

Our team of specialists, with deep knowledge of the Spanish and European market, will guide you from day one.

Cookie Compliance & Digital Consent

Legal

First step

Start with a free diagnostic

Our team of specialists, with deep knowledge of the Spanish and European market, will guide you from day one.

25+
years experience
5
offices in Spain
500+
clients served

Request your diagnostic

We respond within 4 business hours

Or call us directly: +34 910 917 811

Call Contact