How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The dissolution of a community of property without excess in adjudication does not constitute an onerous transfer of assets, being taxed under documented legal acts. If an excess in adjudication exists due to the indivisibility of the asset and the other co-owner is compensated in cash, the operation is not an onerous transfer, but is instead subject to the progressive rate for documented legal acts. In the case of avoidable excesses, the operation will be taxed under the Transfer Tax (ITP).
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the treatment of indivisibility. It is confirmed that cash compensation in cases of indivisible assets avoids classification as an onerous transfer, shifting the tax toward documented legal acts. The doctrine clearly distinguishes between unavoidable excesses (AJD) and avoidable ones (ITP).
Turning points
-
Establishes the distinction between unavoidable excess due to indivisibility (AJD) and avoidable excess (ITP) when dealing with independent plots of land.
-
Specifies that the adjudication of an indivisible property with cash compensation is not an onerous transfer of assets, but is taxed under the progressive rate for AJD.
Analysis based on 38 of 42 rulings with a stated position. Updated 23 September 2026.