Skip to content

Your competitive advantage deserves legal protection

Protection of confidential business information, know-how, and technical data under the Trade Secrets Act. Preventive audits, NDA drafting, litigation, and urgent injunctive relief.

Why unprotected trade secrets and know-how can be legally exploited by competitors and former employees

3
year limitation period from discovery of infringer
Ley 1/2019
Spanish Trade Secrets Act transposing EU Directive 2016/943
3
cumulative requirements: secrecy + commercial value + reasonable measures
4.8/5 on Google · 50+ reviewsSince 2007 · 19 years of experience5 offices in Spain500+ clients
Our approach

Our trade secrets audit, protection, and infringement enforcement process

01

Trade Secret Audit

We identify which information qualifies for legal protection: processes, formulas, databases, customer lists, technical specifications. We assess the three cumulative requirements — secrecy, commercial value, and the adoption of reasonable protective measures.

02

Legal Safeguards

We design the contractual and procedural architecture to establish and document reasonable measures: NDAs for employees and contractors, information-access registers, classification systems, and IT security protocols. Documented measures are essential to invoke protection in court.

03

Preventive Actions

When a leak is suspected or imminent, we seek provisional measures including cease-and-desist orders, seizure of documents and materials, and account-freezing injunctions. Speed is critical — courts grant urgent measures within days.

04

Infringement Litigation

We bring civil claims for cessation of infringing activity, destruction or return of misappropriated information, and full damages (actual loss plus lost profits plus moral harm). Where the misappropriation involves industrial espionage, we coordinate with criminal defence counsel.

05

Regulatory and Post-Litigation

We enforce judgments, monitor compliance with injunctions, and advise on restructuring information systems to prevent recurrence. We also defend clients accused of trade-secret infringement when NDAs or loyalty obligations are asserted without legitimate basis.

The challenge

A competitor launches a product using your process. A former employee joins a rival taking customer lists and formulas. Suppliers replicate your industrial methods. Once confidential information leaks, recovering it is nearly impossible — but the law provides powerful remedies if you act swiftly.

Our solution

We protect your trade secrets end to end: auditing what constitutes protectable information, implementing legal safeguards, drafting confidentiality agreements, and litigating infringement when it occurs. We combine civil remedies under Ley 1/2019 (the Spanish Trade Secrets Act) with criminal actions under Arts. 278–280 of the Penal Code when warranted.

What Qualifies as a Trade Secret?

Ley 1/2019 (the Spanish Trade Secrets Act), which transposed EU Directive 2016/943, defines a trade secret as any information that is: (1) not generally known or readily accessible to persons in the relevant sector — secrecy; (2) has commercial value because it is secret — commercial value; and (3) has been subject to reasonable measures to keep it confidential.

The breadth is intentional. Technical data, manufacturing processes, formulas, software code, customer and supplier lists, business strategies, pricing models, and market analyses all qualify — provided all three elements are met simultaneously.

The Reasonable Measures Requirement

This element is often dispositive in litigation. Courts assess whether the holder took steps proportionate to the value and sensitivity of the information:

  • Contractual measures: NDAs with employees, contractors, suppliers, and investors; post-contractual confidentiality clauses; non-disclosure provisions in licensing agreements
  • Procedural measures: classified-information registers, need-to-know access protocols, clear marking of confidential documents
  • Technical measures: password protection, access-log systems, encryption of stored and transmitted data, physical-security controls

We audit your current practices and design a documented framework that will withstand judicial scrutiny if you ever need to enforce your rights.

Civil and Criminal Remedies

Civil Remedies — Ley 1/2019

  • Injunction to cease acquisition, use, or disclosure of the trade secret
  • Seizure of infringing goods and materials, including digital media
  • Destruction or return of documents containing the secret
  • Full damages: actual losses + lost profits + moral harm; where wilful infringement is proven, courts may award the royalty that would have been due under a licence
  • Publication of judgment in trade publications at the infringer’s cost

Urgent provisional measures are available within days of filing and without prior notice to the defendant where urgency is demonstrated.

Criminal Remedies — Arts. 278–280 Penal Code

Industrial espionage and betrayal of trade secrets by employees or collaborators carries up to two years’ imprisonment (basic offence) and up to three years where the offender is an employee who exploits or reveals the secret. Criminal proceedings run in parallel with civil actions and often produce faster investigative results — including telephone intercepts and evidence orders — that strengthen the civil case.

Employee and Post-Employment Issues

Trade-secret protection does not conflict with employees’ rights to use the skills and general knowledge they acquire during employment. What is protected is specific, documented confidential information that the employer has taken steps to keep secret.

Post-employment NDAs combined with non-compete clauses (enforceable for up to two years for managerial staff under Art. 21 of the Workers’ Statute, subject to proportionate compensation) provide the strongest framework. We draft, review, and enforce these provisions, and we also defend employees who receive unfounded demands that would effectively prevent them from working in their sector.

Defending Against Trade-Secret Claims

Companies accused of misappropriating trade secrets face injunctions that can shut down production lines within days. We provide immediate defensive advice: assessing whether the information genuinely qualifies as a trade secret, identifying lawful acquisition paths (reverse engineering, independent development), and bringing counterclaims for wrongful injunction where the claimant cannot satisfy the three-element test.

This service is part of our intellectual property and commercial legal practice.

Concrete deliverables

Trade-secret portfolio audit

Trade-secret portfolio audit (identify, classify, document).

NDA and confidentiality agreement drafting and review

NDA and confidentiality agreement drafting and review.

Employee and contractor information-access protocols

Employee and contractor information-access protocols.

Urgent provisional measures

injunctions and seizure orders

Civil infringement litigation under Ley 1/2019

Civil infringement litigation under Ley 1/2019.

Criminal complaint under Arts. 278–280 Penal Code

Criminal complaint under Arts. 278–280 Penal Code.

Defence against unfounded trade-secret claims

Defence against unfounded trade-secret claims.

Post-judgment enforcement and compliance monitoring

Post-judgment enforcement and compliance monitoring.

Service Lead

Sofia Navarro Estevez

Associate - Legal Division

LLM in Technology Law and Digital Regulation, King's College London Law Degree, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Under Ley 1/2019 transposing EU Directive 2016/943, a trade secret must satisfy three cumulative elements: (1) the information is not generally known or readily accessible — secrecy; (2) it has commercial value precisely because it is secret; and (3) the holder has adopted reasonable measures to keep it secret. Formulas, processes, methods, customer databases, business plans, and software code all qualify if the three elements are met. Excluded are skills and knowledge that employees legitimately acquire during employment.
Civil remedies include: injunction to cease the infringing act; recall and destruction of infringing goods; prohibition on production, marketing, or use; and full compensation for economic damages (actual harm + lost profits + unjust enrichment). Courts may also order publication of the judgment. Criminal remedies under Arts. 278–280 Penal Code carry imprisonment of up to two years plus fines, and up to three years when the breach involves betrayal by employees or collaborators.
Courts examine the totality of protective measures: signed NDAs with employees and contractors, restricted information-access systems, physical and IT security, classification markings, and employee training. There is no single mandatory measure — what matters is whether the precautions are proportionate to the value and sensitivity of the information. An audit documents these measures and creates evidence for any future litigation.
Yes, if the information qualifies as a trade secret and reasonable measures were in place. Post-contractual confidentiality obligations and non-compete clauses (up to two years for managers under the Workers' Statute) reinforce protection. However, employees retain the right to use the general skills and knowledge they have legitimately acquired — trade secret law does not restrict that.
Three years from the date on which the holder became aware — or had reasonable grounds to become aware — of the identity of the infringer and the infringing conduct. Urgent provisional measures are available immediately on suspicion of infringement, before any formal claim is filed.
Yes. Ley 1/2019 imposes a statutory duty of confidentiality on anyone who acquired a trade secret under a confidentiality obligation or in conditions where they knew or should have known the information was confidential — regardless of whether they signed an explicit NDA. The duty also attaches to those who obtained the secret through unlawful means. However, the absence of a documented NDA weakens the company's position on the "reasonable measures" element, which is often the disputed ground in litigation. The combination of an NDA, an information-access register, and a clearly communicated confidentiality policy creates the most defensible evidentiary position.
Yes, provided the disclosure was made under a confidentiality obligation — typically a non-disclosure agreement or a confidentiality clause in a term sheet, LOI, or joint-venture framework agreement. Disclosures during due diligence without a signed NDA may not be protected if the recipient can argue the information was not marked confidential or that no confidentiality conditions were imposed. We advise on the scope and form of NDA coverage required before any third-party disclosure of commercially sensitive technical, financial, or strategic information.
A patent provides a 20-year exclusive right enforceable against any infringer, including independent developers — but requires full public disclosure of the invention in the patent application and involves registration cost and prosecution time. A trade secret provides unlimited duration protection as long as secrecy is maintained, with no registration or disclosure required — but is lost if the information is independently discovered or reverse-engineered by a competitor, and does not prevent third parties from using the same information if they developed it independently. For processes where reverse engineering is difficult and the competitive advantage is long-lived, trade secret protection under Ley 1/2019 is frequently the stronger commercial choice.
Yes. Ley 1/2019 Art. 3(1)(c) classifies as unlawful any acquisition, use, or disclosure of a trade secret by a third party who knew or should have known that the information was obtained from a person in breach of their confidentiality obligations. This applies directly to a competitor that hires a former employee and uses trade secrets the employee took. The claim may be brought against both the former employee (for breach of duty) and the acquiring company (for knowingly benefiting from the breach). Provisional measures — including an injunction against use of the information — can be sought urgently on an ex parte basis before the competitor is put on notice.
Quick assessment

Does this apply to you?

Answer in under 30 seconds to see whether this service fits your case before getting in touch.

Has a former employee or contractor taken our customer list, process documentation, or software to a competitor?

We suspect a supplier or partner is replicating our proprietary methods — what can we do?

We want to share sensitive technical information with a potential investor — how do we protect it?

A competitor has launched a product that is suspiciously similar to our patented process — is trade-secret action quicker than patent litigation?

We have been served with a cease-and-desist letter claiming we misappropriated a trade secret — we need immediate advice.

0 of 5 questions answered

First step

Start with a free diagnostic

Our team of specialists, with deep knowledge of the Spanish and European market, will guide you from day one.

Trade Secrets Protection

Legal

Talk to the partner in charge

Response within 24 business hours. First meeting free.

Email
Contact