How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The exemption of severance pay requires that the recognition of unfair dismissal occurs through a judicial ruling or during a conciliation act before the SMAC. If these mechanisms are not met, the amount is taxed as employment income, although the 30% reduction from article 18.2 of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law) could apply. Likewise, providing services for the same company or a related company in the following three years presumes the non-existence of a real severance of the employment relationship.
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the requirement of a conciliation act or judicial ruling for the exemption of severance pay. Throughout the rulings, the limits of the exemption for senior management and the possibility of applying reductions for employment income have been specified. The latest ruling introduces a presumption of the non-existence of severance in the event of re-hiring within a three-year period.
Turning points
-
Specifies that in senior management relationships, the entirety of the severance pay is taxed as there are no mandatory maximum limits.
-
Establishes the presumption of the non-existence of a real severance if services are provided to the same company or a related company in the three years following the dismissal.
Analysis based on 20 of 20 rulings with a stated position. Updated 25 September 2026.