How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
When an entity acts as a substitute for the taxpayer by legal imposition and not by express mandate of the client, the taxes it must collect do not have the nature of disbursements (suplidos). These amounts must be included in the VAT (IVA) taxable base of the main provision. This inclusion depends on the existence of a direct link between the tax and the service or its accessory nature to the provision.
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the distinction between a disbursement and substitution. The doctrine establishes that legal substitution prevents treating the tax as an expense on behalf of another, requiring its inclusion in the VAT (IVA) taxable base. Recent rulings reinforce this criterion by applying it to various types of fees and port or waste services.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the holder of an establishment acts as a substitute for the taxpayer by legal imposition and not by mandate, therefore the tax must be included in the VAT (IVA) taxable base.
-
Introduces the need for a direct link between the tax and the provision for its inclusion in the taxable base, ruling out the inclusion of the ITF because it does not fall upon the service provided.
Analysis based on 23 of 23 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.