How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The habitual residence is defined by continuous residence for at least three years or by having been the residence in the two years prior to the transfer. Registration in the municipal register (empadronamiento) is not a sufficient element on its own to prove residence or habitual residence. The proof of residence is a matter of fact that the taxpayer must prove through any means admitted by law.
The DGT's position has remained constant throughout the analyzed period. Since 2014, the Administration has maintained that registration in the municipal register is not sufficient proof to establish habitual residence. The doctrine has been consolidated by reaffirming that residence is a matter of fact that requires other means of proof.
Turning points
-
Specifies that registration in the municipal register or the change of tax residence is not sufficient on its own to prove residence.
Analysis based on 41 of 43 rulings with a stated position. Updated 23 September 2026.