How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The dwelling must be the habitual residence for a continuous period of at least three years. To make an exception to this period, circumstances must arise that necessarily require a change of residence, implying an obligation that cannot be dispensed with. Situations such as the birth of children, lack of space for teleworking, or marriage alone are not considered causes that compel a change. The Administration will assess whether the situation constitutes an indispensable necessity or a voluntary decision based on convenience.
The DGT has moved from requiring effective and permanent occupation (V2626-14) to establishing a three-year period as a general rule (V1073-20). From that point on, the doctrine has remained constant by restricting exceptions to cases of indispensable necessity. The most recent rulings (V2476-21, V0052-24, V1533-26) have further specified that personal or family convenience does not constitute an obligation to change residence.
Turning points
-
Establishes the requirement of residence for a continuous period of at least three years for the consideration of a habitual residence.
-
Clarifies that the lack of space for teleworking is not a circumstance that necessarily requires a change of residence.
Analysis based on 26 of 27 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.