How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The dissolution of a community of property does not constitute a transfer of assets nor does it generate gains in Personal Income Tax (IRPF) if the adjudication is carried out in proportion to the ownership share. If there is an excess of adjudication, an alteration of assets occurs, generating gains or losses in IRPF. In the Transfer Tax and Stamp Duty (ITPAJD) framework, the excess of adjudication is taxed as onerous transfers of assets (ITP), unless it is unavoidable due to the indivisibility of the asset, in which case it is taxed under Documented Legal Acts (AJD).
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the distinction between proportional adjudication and excess of adjudication. The evolution focuses on technical precision regarding when the excess is unavoidable (taxed under AJD) or avoidable (taxed under ITP), and on the confirmation that any excess generates an alteration of assets for IRPF purposes.
Turning points
-
Establishes that an excess of adjudication is not an onerous transfer if it is unavoidable to prevent the impairment of the asset, being taxed under AJD.
-
Clarifies the distinction between unavoidable excess (AJD) and avoidable excess (ITP) through the example of independent assets.
Analysis based on 40 of 41 rulings with a stated position. Updated 23 September 2026.