How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The reduction under Article 23.2 of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law) requires that the property be used to satisfy the tenant's permanent housing need according to the LAU (Urban Leasing Act). Seasonal leases, such as those entered into for university studies, do not meet this requirement of permanence. The burden of proof regarding the purpose of the rental lies with the taxpayer.
The DGT's position has remained constant since 2016, denying the 60% reduction on seasonal rentals. The most recent rulings have specified that proving the permanent housing need is a matter of fact that must be proven by the taxpayer.
Turning points
-
Establishes that proving the purpose of the rental to satisfy the permanent housing need is a matter of fact that must be proven by the taxpayer.
Analysis based on 9 of 9 rulings with a stated position. Updated 30 September 2026.