How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
For the taxable event of a gift to exist, the animus donandi must be present, understood as the intention to make a gratuity. In fund transfer or intermediation operations, the classification of the operation will depend on the evidence provided and on the determination by the managing office as to whether there is a gratuitous acquisition with animus donandi and animus accipiendi.
The DGT's position remains stable in requiring the intent of gratuity to constitute the taxable event. Throughout the rulings, consistency has been maintained by ruling out gifts in cases of debt compensation, joint bank account ownership without the intention of a gift, or mere fund intermediation.
Turning points
-
Establishes that joint ownership of an account does not imply a gift if the act of disposal with the intent of gratuity, the acceptance by the donee, and the knowledge of the donor are not present.
-
Specifies that the existence of a gift requires both animus donandi and animus accipiendi, making the classification subject to the evidence provided by the interested party.
Analysis based on 46 of 48 rulings with a stated position. Updated 21 September 2026.