How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The distinction between remuneration in kind and monetary remuneration depends on whether there is a contractual or collective agreement obligation to supply the good or service, or if the company acts merely as a payment mediator. If the company pays a third party by mandate of the employee so that the latter uses their salary, it is monetary income. In the case of professional association fees, if the employer pays the fee, it is remuneration in kind, but it is deductible if the professional association is mandatory for the activity and does not exceed 500 euros per year.
The DGT's position remains constant in the differentiation between payment mediation and the obligation to supply. The doctrine establishes that payment to third parties by mandate of the worker constitutes monetary income, while the fulfillment of a contractual obligation of the company constitutes remuneration in kind. No doctrinal shifts are observed, but rather a coherent application of the nature of the payment.
Analysis based on 20 of 20 rulings with a stated position. Updated 25 September 2026.