How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Employment income is imputed to the period in which the judicial ruling becomes final or when it becomes enforceable, as in the case of unused holidays. The 30% reduction for irregularity requires that the income be notably irregular or have a generation period exceeding two years. This reduction does not apply if the income derives from ex novo agreements or from concepts that do not meet the dual condition of seniority and the validity of a collective agreement.
The DGT's position remains constant in its restrictive interpretation of irregular income. Throughout the consultations, it is confirmed that concepts such as back pay, performance bonuses, or severance gratifications do not qualify for the 30% reduction if they do not strictly meet the requirements of temporality or irregular nature. The doctrine is consistent in the distinction between exempt indemnities and employment income.
Turning points
-
Clarifies that the application of the reduction from the eleventh transitional provision does not prevent the application of the reduction for irregularity under article 18.2 of Law 35/2006 on Personal Income Tax (IRPF).
Analysis based on 52 of 52 rulings with a stated position. Updated 19 September 2026.