How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The deduction for investment in the primary residence applies only to the amounts paid for the proportional share of the property held by the taxpayer. In the event of excess payments by a co-owner, the surplus does not generate a right to deduction and is considered a loan or a gift to the other owner. Following the dissolution of a co-ownership (condominium), the new owner may deduct the amount that the former co-owner would have been entitled to deduct had the dissolution not occurred.
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the application of the deduction for investment in the primary residence, limited to the participation quota of each co-owner. Rulings have specified that the novation of loans or the acquisition of new undivided interests do not increase the right to deduction. The doctrine has focused on delimiting the scope of transitional regimes and the nature of payments made by co-owners.
Turning points
-
Establishes that if a joint borrower pays more than their proportional share, the excess is not deductible and is considered a loan or gift in favor of the other co-owner.
-
Allows the new owner following the dissolution of a co-ownership to deduct the amount that the former co-owner would have been entitled to deduct according to the transitional regime.
Analysis based on 81 of 84 rulings with a stated position. Updated 21 September 2026.