How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The deduction for investment in the primary residence applies only to the proportional part that each borrower has allocated to the acquisition of their respective undivided share of ownership. If a co-owner pays installments exceeding their ownership percentage, the excess is considered a loan or a gift to the other co-owner. In divorce cases, the imputation of real estate income for the undivided share is not applicable if the use of the dwelling has been attributed to the former spouse through a judicial settlement agreement.
The DGT's position remains stable regarding the limitation of the deduction for investment in housing to the proportional part of the undivided ownership. Throughout the rulings, it has been specified that payments exceeding the ownership share do not generate a right to deduction, but are instead classified as loans or gifts. The doctrine confirms that ownership of the undivided share is determined at the time of the contribution or acquisition.
Turning points
-
Specifies that the deduction is limited to the proportional part of the capital allocated to the undivided share of ownership, classifying the excess paid as a loan or a gift.
Analysis based on 19 of 21 rulings with a stated position. Updated 25 September 2026.