How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
For the limit under Article 16 of the LIS (Corporate Income Tax Law), income and expenses from financial hedges linked to indebtedness are included. However, derivatives that cover price risks to stabilize procurement costs (such as in PPA contracts) are not considered financial expenses or income for this limit. Likewise, expenses from the early termination of hedges unrelated to the covered item are not included in net financial expenses.
The DGT's position remains stable regarding the definition of net financial expenses, but it has clarified the nature of the elements that comprise it. It has been clarified that derivatives intended to stabilize procurement costs rather than cover debt do not count toward the limit. It has also been delimited that the loss of hedge status or the early termination of unrelated instruments does not affect the calculation.
Turning points
-
Establishes that expenses from the early termination of a hedging instrument unrelated to the covered item are not business indebtedness expenses.
-
Specifies that derivatives covering price risks to stabilize procurement costs are not considered financial expenses or income for the Article 16 LIS limit.
Analysis based on 26 of 27 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.