How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Severance payments resulting from mutual agreement are considered employment income and do not benefit from the exemption under Article 7 e) of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law). Although they are considered income obtained in a notoriously irregular manner, the 30% reduction under Article 18.2 of the LIRPF only applies if they are attributed to a single tax period. If the payment is fragmented over several tax years, the right to said reduction is lost.
The DGT's position remains constant in classifying these amounts as employment income without exemption. The evolution focuses on the restrictive application of the reduction for irregular income, requiring attribution to a single tax year for its application. Rulings such as V2495-23 and V1837-25 reinforce that the fragmentation of payment prevents the tax benefit.
Turning points
-
Establishes that termination by mutual agreement does not allow for the exemption under Article 7 e) of the LIRPF, but does allow for the 30% reduction if attributed to a single period.
-
Clarifies that compensation for contract suspension does not qualify as income obtained in a notoriously irregular manner as it does not derive from a termination.
Analysis based on 29 of 30 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.