How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The reverse charge mechanism for the taxpayer in the delivery of real estate to extinguish debt requires that the asset be encumbered by a real security right and that the acquirer be an entrepreneur or professional. In the case of debt forgiveness (quitas), the extinction of the debt generates a loss of assets that must be included in the general tax base as it derives from the extinction of a credit right. Definitive non-payment that extinguishes the credit right allows for the modification of the tax base according to the IVA (Value Added Tax) Law.
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the application of the reverse charge mechanism when a real security exists for debt extinction. No changes are observed in the treatment of debt forgiveness, which remains classified as general income due to the extinction of credit rights. The doctrine is consistent in distinguishing between the transfer of assets and the extinction of obligations.
Turning points
-
Specifies that the reverse charge mechanism mandatory requires the real estate to be encumbered by a real security right, excluding debts with only personal guarantees.
-
Establishes that debt forgiveness generates a loss of assets included in the general tax base as it derives from the extinction of a credit right and not from a transfer.
Analysis based on 15 of 15 rulings with a stated position. Updated 26 September 2026.