How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The refund of tax only proceeds in the event of a final judicial or administrative nullity, rescission, or termination that does not generate lucrative effects. To avoid the lucrative effect, interested parties must prove the reciprocal return of benefits according to article 1295 of the Civil Code. If the termination is by mutual agreement, there is no right to a refund and it is considered a new taxable event. In the case of IVA (Value Added Tax), the termination is treated as a rectification of the tax base through a credit note.
The DGT's position remains constant in requiring a final resolution and the absence of lucrative effects to allow for a refund. The doctrine has clarified the concept of lucrative effect, requiring proof of the reciprocal return of benefits to avoid partial settlement for the use of the asset. The refusal of a refund in cases of mutual agreement is maintained.
Turning points
-
Establishes that to avoid the lucrative effect, the performance of the reciprocal returns under article 1295 of the Civil Code must be justified.
Analysis based on 8 of 8 rulings with a stated position. Updated 30 September 2026.