Skip to content

Doctrine by topic · DGT Observatory

Corporate Sole Trader: DGT doctrinal evolution

How the DGT's position on this topic has evolved, and the rulings it rests on.

← DGT Observatory

How the DGT's position has evolved

Refined position High confidence 8 rulings · 2021–2024

Current position

The refund of excess contributions in Corporate Tax (IS) is imputed as income in the period in which the right to the refund is recognized. In Personal Income Tax (IRPF), if the contributions were included as an expense and benefit in kind, the refund requires the rectification of the tax returns for the corresponding fiscal years. Regarding Value Added Tax (IVA), liability depends on the existence of a relationship of subordination or independence of the shareholder vis-à-vis the company.

The DGT's position shows a clear distinction between the treatment in Corporate Tax (IS) and Personal Income Tax (IRPF) regarding the refund of contributions. Initially, rulings suggested imputing the refund in the fiscal year the right was recognized, but it was subsequently established that for IRPF, the fiscal year in which they were deducted must be rectified. No evolution is observed in the refund criterion itself, but rather a clarification of the difference between taxes.

Turning points

  1. V1495-21

    Introduces the obligation to rectify the tax returns of the corresponding fiscal years when the refund affects contributions included as income in kind.

Analysis based on 8 of 8 rulings with a stated position. Updated 1 October 2026.

Rulings on this topic

8

Apply this to your case

Email
Contact