How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The recovery of ownership through contract termination does not constitute a new onerous transfer of assets, but rather the restitution of the item as the original act becomes void. If the termination is formalized through a court judgment, it is not subject to the Documented Legal Acts (AJD) modality as there is no public deed. Conversely, if a notarial deed is executed to register the recovery, it could be subject to the gradual AJD tax rate.
The DGT's position remains stable regarding the fact that termination is not a new transfer, but a restitution. The effects have been specified according to the method of termination: the judicial route avoids taxation via AJD, whereas termination by mutual agreement through a deed is treated as a new act subject to taxation.
Turning points
-
Distinguishes the treatment according to the method of termination: the judicial route allows for a tax refund, while termination by mutual agreement is considered a new act subject to taxation.
-
Clarifies that recovery through a court judgment does not trigger liability for the Documented Legal Acts (AJD) modality due to the absence of a public deed.
Analysis based on 51 of 52 rulings with a stated position. Updated 23 September 2026.