How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The exemption for persons in a situation of severe dependency requires that the transferred property be the taxpayer's habitual residence. A habitual residence is considered to be the building where one has resided for at least three years, or has resided for the two years prior to the transfer. The restitution of amounts due to the nullity of a multi-currency clause is not income, but it requires the regularization of deductions for investment in the habitual residence if they were applied. Grants for health services do not constitute income as they do not demonstrate economic capacity.
The DGT's position is heterogeneous when dealing with different concepts of income. There is no single doctrinal evolution, but rather specific criteria for cases involving cash movements, public grants, contractual nullities, and dependency exemptions. The administration maintains the requirement to prove the origin of funds in cash movements and the need to meet temporal requirements for the habitual residence.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the movement of cash has no significance for IRPF (Personal Income Tax), but imposes the burden of proving the origin of the money.
-
Clarifies that the restitution due to the nullity of a multi-currency clause is not income, but links it to the loss of deductions for investment in the habitual residence.
Analysis based on 26 of 26 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.