How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Income obtained from services provided without labor dependency or alienation is classified as income from professional economic activities. In the case of teaching, the classification depends on whether the activity is direct and personal (professional) or carried out through an organization (business). Regarding court costs awards, the payment constitutes a capital gain for the prevailing party and not professional income for the lawyer; therefore, there is no obligation to withhold tax for the party ordered to pay.
The DGT's position shows a divergent evolution depending on the scenario. Regarding court costs awards, there has been a clear reversal: from considering that the payment could be professional income or a generic capital gain, it has been specified that it is compensation that does not entail withholding for the debtor. Regarding the classification of activities, the DGT maintains differentiated criteria between professional and business activities based on the organization of resources.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the payment of court costs is compensation and not professional income, being integrated as a capital gain.
-
Specifies that the party ordered to pay is not satisfying professional income to the lawyer, eliminating the obligation to perform IRPF (Personal Income Tax) withholding by the debtor.
Analysis based on 25 of 26 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.