How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Amounts received due to the recovery or suppression of extraordinary pay are considered income from employment and must be attributed to the tax period in which they become due to the recipient. Regarding the enforcement of debts, if the ordinary monthly salary is received alongside an extraordinary pay, the non-seizability limit is double the monthly SMI (Minimum Interprofessional Wage). If the extraordinary pay is already prorated into the monthly salary, the limit is the annual SMI prorated over twelve months.
The DGT's position remains constant in classifying these amounts as income from employment due at the time of payment, rejecting their consideration as arrears or irregular income. The evolution focuses on technical precision regarding the calculation of non-seizability limits when ordinary and extraordinary payments coincide.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the right to receipt arises with the payment agreement, preventing the application of the 40% reduction for irregular income.
-
Specifies the calculation of the non-seizability limit depending on whether the extraordinary pay is received as a lump sum or if it is already prorated into the monthly salary.
Analysis based on 37 of 38 rulings with a stated position. Updated 23 September 2026.