How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Improvement pacts with present effects are considered lucrative transmissions mortis causa for the application of article 33.3.b) of the IRPF Law (Personal Income Tax Law), which prevents the existence of capital gains or losses. In the case of the award of life usufruct through these pacts, the IIVTNU (Transfer Tax and Stamp Duty) taxable event is triggered by the transmission of a real right of enjoyment. For the exemption due to reinvestment in a primary residence, the three-year period of habitual residence must be computed from the acquisition of ownership through the pact.
The DGT's position has shifted from focusing on the impossibility of accumulating improvement pacts with donations in Inheritance and Gift Tax, to defining their tax nature in the IRPF. The criterion that these pacts are lucrative transmissions mortis causa has been consolidated, which neutralizes capital gains. Recently, the doctrine has extended to the application of residence requirements for exemptions and the accrual of transfer tax.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the accumulation regulations of the LISD (Inheritance and Gift Tax Law) do not apply to succession pacts, as they are titles distinct from inter vivos donations.
-
Defines the improvement pact as a lucrative transmission mortis causa for the IRPF, eliminating capital gains or losses in operations with present effects.
Analysis based on 29 of 30 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.