How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The donation of bare ownership generates a capital gain or loss, although it is exempt if the donor is over 65 years of age and the asset is their primary residence. In Personal Income Tax (IRPF), the imputed income for the use of real estate corresponds to the usufructuary and not to the bare owner. The extinction of the usufruct due to death is not a new acquisition, but rather the recovery of rights of enjoyment, maintaining the original acquisition date.
The DGT's position remains constant in the application of current regulations without fundamental doctrinal changes. The rulings address different aspects such as the impact on economic activity, the exemption based on age, or the imputation of income, but without modifying the applied principles. There is no evolution in the criterion, but rather an application of the law to diverse scenarios.
Turning points
-
Establishes that bare ownership cannot qualify for the special regime of art. 87 LIS due to the lack of rights of use and enjoyment.
-
Clarifies that the extinction of the usufruct due to death is not a new acquisition, but the recovery of rights of enjoyment with the original acquisition date.
Analysis based on 64 of 67 rulings with a stated position. Updated 15 September 2026.