How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Amounts received through mutual agreement resolution have the nature of employment income obtained in a notoriously irregular manner. The 30% reduction provided for in Article 18.2 of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law) is applicable as long as such income is imputed to a single tax period. The limitation stating that the reduction does not apply if similar income has been received in the previous five years does not affect this case, as these are not earnings with a generation period exceeding two years.
The DGT's position has moved from considering that suspension allowances did not allow for the reduction, to establishing that resolution by mutual agreement does indeed constitute notoriously irregular income. The doctrine has consolidated around the requirement to impute the amount in a single tax year to access the benefit. Recently, it has been specified that the five-year limitation is not applicable to this type of income.
Turning points
-
Establishes that amounts from mutual agreement resolution are considered employment income obtained in a notoriously irregular manner.
-
Clarifies that the prohibition on applying the reduction due to having received other income in the previous five years does not apply, as these are not earnings with a generation period exceeding two years.
Analysis based on 58 of 60 rulings with a stated position. Updated 19 September 2026.