Doctrine by topic · DGT Observatory

Wage Garnishment: DGT doctrinal evolution

How the DGT's position on this topic has evolved, and the rulings it rests on.

← DGT Observatory

How the DGT's position has evolved

Refined position High confidence 13 rulings · 2018–2026

Current position

The non-seizability limit is determined according to the number of annual payments received. If the salary already includes the pro-rata distribution of payments, the limit is the annual SMI (Minimum Interprofessional Wage) pro-rated over 12 months. In months with an extraordinary payment, the limit is double the amount resulting from dividing the annual SMI by the number of payments. Severance payments are subject to garnishment without the SMI limits.

The DGT has moved from a generic application of the LEC (Civil Procedure Law) to a technical precision regarding the calculation of the non-seizability limit according to the number of annual payments. It has been clarified that termination indemnities do not enjoy the SMI garnishment limits. The position has become more detailed in determining the non-seizable portion according to the worker's payment regime.

Turning points

  1. V0169-19

    Establishes that termination indemnities are not considered salary and do not benefit from the SMI garnishment limits.

  2. V0643-24

    Specifies that the non-seizability limit is determined according to the number of annual payments, adjusting the calculation if the salary already includes the pro-rata distribution.

Analysis based on 12 of 13 rulings with a stated position. Updated 26 September 2026.

Rulings on this topic

13
V0169-19 25 Jan 2019

SMI seizure limits apply only to payments classified as salary

SG de Tributos
embargo de sueldossalario mínimo interprofesionalindemnización por rescisiónpercepciones económicaslímites de embargabilidad LGT — Ley 58/2003 General Tributaria art. 169.2.cLGT — Ley 58/2003 General Tributaria art. 7.2
Affects CompanyExpat · Non-residentIndividual
Email
Contact