How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The tax residence of natural persons is their habitual residence, which requires continuous residence, effective use, and a permanent character. The determination of residence is a question of fact that the taxpayer must prove through means valid in Law. Registration in the municipal register (empadronamiento), registration in the Economic Activities Registry (IAE), or the mere transfer of tax residence are not sufficient elements on their own to prove the habitual residence.
The DGT's position remains constant in requiring factual evidence to prove habitual residence. Throughout the rulings, it has been reiterated that registration in the municipal register or the tax residence is not enough to prove residence. The latest resolutions specify the elements of the habitual residence, such as effective use and permanent character.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the accreditation of residence is a question of fact and that simple registration in the municipal register or the transfer of tax residence are not sufficient.
-
Defines that the habitual residence requires continuous residence, effective use, and permanent character, discarding registration in the IAE as sufficient proof.
Analysis based on 41 of 42 rulings with a stated position. Updated 23 September 2026.