How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The dissolution of the community property regime does not constitute a change in assets if the adjudication conforms to each spouse's ownership share. In this case, no capital gain or loss is generated, and the assets maintain their original value and acquisition date. A change in assets only occurs if the adjudication exceeds said share.
The DGT's position has remained constant over time. Rulings confirm that adjudication in accordance with the ownership share is not a transfer, but rather a specification of rights. The requirement to pay ITP (Transfer Tax and Stamp Duty) remains in the event of excess adjudications that could be avoided through the formation of equivalent lots.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the excess in adjudication is onerous in nature and must be taxed via ITP if it can be avoided through the formation of more equivalent lots.
-
Clarifies that the adjudication of separate property does not benefit from the exemption under article 45.I.B.3 of the TRLITPAJD as it does not form part of the marital community.
Analysis based on 8 of 8 rulings with a stated position. Updated 1 October 2026.