How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The imputation of real estate income corresponds to the holder of the real rights of enjoyment, such as the usufructuary, and not to the bare owner. This obligation is based on the availability of the property and not on its actual use, without admitting exceptions for illness or work. Imputation is not applicable if the property is the habitual residence or if it does not generate capital income.
The DGT's position remains constant in attributing the income to the holder of the real right of enjoyment. Throughout the rulings, consistency has been maintained in that the usufructuary is the taxpayer for the imputation purposes compared to the bare owner. The most recent rulings specify that the availability of the asset is the determining factor, regardless of actual use.
Analysis based on 29 of 30 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.