How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Compensations for the suppression or substitution of pension supplements are considered income from employment obtained in a notoriously irregular manner, allowing for the 30% reduction if imputed to a single tax period. On the other hand, the gender gap reduction supplement has the nature of a contributory public pension and is taxed as income from employment, without the possibility of applying the exemption under article 7.h) of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law).
The DGT's position has moved from addressing procedural aspects of specific supplements to defining the tax nature of compensations for the suppression of supplements and new concepts such as the gender gap supplement. No change in criterion is observed, but rather an expansion of the scope of application of the doctrine regarding the classification of this income.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the compensation for the suppression of a pension supplement is notoriously irregular income, allowing for the 30% reduction if imputed to a single period.
-
Determines that the gender gap reduction supplement is a contributory public pension and, therefore, is taxed as income from employment without exemption.
Analysis based on 8 of 8 rulings with a stated position. Updated 1 October 2026.