How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The increase in expenses due to geographic mobility requires that the taxpayer be registered with the employment office and that the new job requires a change of habitual residence. There must be a direct causal relationship between the acceptance of the employment and the relocation, where a prolonged period between both events may indicate a lack of causality. The benefit applies in the year of the change and in the following year, limited to the income that motivated the relocation.
The DGT's position remains stable regarding the application of geographic mobility benefits, but it has specified the causality requirements. While in 2020 the focus was on the condition of being unemployed prior to selection, the current 2025 doctrine emphasizes the need for a causal relationship between the employment and the relocation to avoid indications of a lack of connection.
Turning points
-
Introduces the need to prove a causal relationship between the acceptance of the employment and the relocation, warning that a prolonged period between both may be an indication of a lack of causality.
Analysis based on 51 of 54 rulings with a stated position. Updated 15 September 2026.