How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
There is a legal incompatibility between the right to the minimum allowance for descendants and the special regime for child support annuities (Articles 64 and 75 of the Personal Income Tax Law [LIRPF]). The parent with custody, whether sole or shared, is entitled to a prorated minimum allowance for descendants, but cannot opt for child support annuities. The latter regime is only applicable when the parent paying child support is not entitled to the minimum allowance for descendants.
The DGT's position has moved from a restrictive interpretation regarding the application of child support annuities to a clarification of the incompatibility with the minimum allowance for descendants. While in 2014 the use of annuities was limited if the minimum allowance was applied, more recent rulings (V2871-23 and V5314-26) confirm that custody grants the right to a prorated minimum allowance, definitively excluding the option for the special child support regime.
Turning points
-
Establishes that in shared custody, the minimum allowance for descendants is prorated in equal parts, but confirms the incompatibility with the special regimes of Articles 64 and 75 LIRPF.
-
Specifies that education and medical expenses in judicial agreements may be applied as child support annuities as long as they fit the definition of child support under Article 142 of the Civil Code.
Analysis based on 45 of 47 rulings with a stated position. Updated 23 September 2026.