How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The tax classification of amounts derived from agreements or rulings depends on their nature. Indemnities for breach of non-compete clauses are considered general income as they are capital losses unrelated to transfers. Employment income pending judicial resolution is imputed to the tax year in which the ruling becomes final, allowing for the reduction for irregularity if the generation period exceeds two years.
The DGT's position shows fragmentation depending on the nature of the concept, without a single trend. A clear distinction is observed between the temporal imputation of employment income (V2190-18, V1497-21) and the classification of indemnities for breach of clauses as general income (V0023-25). There is no linear evolution, but rather a specialization of criteria for different scenarios involving agreements or rulings.
Turning points
-
Establishes that if arrears cover a generation period exceeding two years, the reduction for irregularity under article 18.2 of the Personal Income Tax Law (LIRPF) applies.
-
Classifies the indemnity for breach of a non-compete clause as general income, as it is a capital loss unrelated to a transfer.
Analysis based on 29 of 32 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.