Skip to content
BOE-A-2026-11143 ·23 May 2026 ·Act critical
Tax

Companies with duplicated mortgages: 30 days to justify preventive annotation or it is denied

The resolution denies preventive annotation due to double registration, in accordance with rule eight of article 209.1 of the Mortgage Law. The appeal was submitted by a company (Bullblok Machinery, S.L.U.) through a digitally signed document dated September 19, 2025. The decision is based on double registration, which prevents the practice of preventive annotation under current law (art. 209.1, rule eight).

In 2 key points

  1. Preventive annotation is refused due to double registration (art. 209.1, regla octava)
  2. The appeal was submitted via a digitally signed document on 19 September 2025 (fecha: 19 de septiembre de 2025)

How it affects those involved

For companies managing mortgages, this means that if double registrations exist, they will be unable to carry out preventive annotations without justifying their situation. Lawyers and real estate managers must review registration records to avoid errors. Registry administrations will maintain the validity of the double registration rule as a basis for refusal. Advisors must inform their clients of the risk of refusal if the situation is not justified.

Lifecycle

2026-05-23PublishedPublished in the BOE
Official text Based on BOE data (boe.es). Information, not advice.

Does this provision affect you?

The tax team reviews your specific situation.

Talk to the tax team
This analysis is informational only and does not constitute legal advice or create a client-adviser relationship. BM Consulting.
Email
Contact