How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The imputation of real estate income for the family home, whose use is attributed to the ex-spouse or children under Article 96 of the Civil Code, is not applicable, regardless of whether it is the habitual residence of the other parent. However, if there is no judicial attribution of the right of use and the ex-spouse resides in it, the owner must impute real estate income for their share of ownership.
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the non-imputation of income when there is an attribution of use under Article 96 of the Civil Code (V1929-17, V1594-19, V1409-25). The evolution is limited to specifying that the absence of a judicial decision on attribution obliges the imputation of income if the ex-spouse resides in the property (V1409-25).
Turning points
-
Establishes that the lack of judicial attribution of the right of use obliges the owner to impute real estate income if the ex-spouse resides in the home.
Analysis based on 13 of 13 rulings with a stated position. Updated 27 September 2026.