How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The dissolution of the community property regime and the adjudication of assets do not alter the composition of the estate if the ownership share of each spouse is respected, maintaining the original values and acquisition dates. If the adjudication exceeds the corresponding share, a transfer occurs that generates a capital gain or loss. In the case of the adjudication of separate property real estate in exchange for the interest in the community property, the operation is classified as a barter subject to onerous transfers of property.
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the fact that adjudication by ownership share does not alter the estate nor generate capital gains. The doctrine has been refined regarding the classification of specific operations, such as the barter of separate property for the interest in the community property, and the liability for the IIVTNU (Tax on Property Transfers and Legal Acts) in transfers subsequent to the liquidation.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the adjudication of a spouse's separate property real estate in exchange for the interest in the community property constitutes a barter subject to onerous transfers of property.
Analysis based on 34 of 35 rulings with a stated position. Updated 16 September 2026.