How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Matrimonial separation may exempt the requirement of three years of continuous residence for the reinvestment exemption if the circumstance necessarily requires a change of domicile. The mere occurrence of the event is not enough; the taxpayer must demonstrate that the change is an indispensable necessity and not a voluntary option. The assessment of this necessity is a matter of fact that falls under the responsibility of the Tax Administration.
The DGT's position has remained constant over time. The criterion establishes that separation is a potential cause to omit the three-year residence period, but always subject to the condition that the change of domicile is an obligation derived from the situation and not a choice made for convenience. The rulings reiterate that the burden of proof and the assessment of the necessity of the change lie with the Administration.
Turning points
-
Establishes that if the taxpayer was already separated at the start of residence in the dwelling, the move is not considered a consequence of the separation and the three-year period must be fulfilled.
-
Clarifies that the separation of a domestic partnership is not automatically equated to matrimonial separation for the purposes of excepting the residence period.
Analysis based on 13 of 13 rulings with a stated position. Updated 27 September 2026.