How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The exemption under article 7.p) of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law) requires that the work be effectively performed abroad for a non-resident entity or permanent establishment. In cases of subcontracting, the final recipient of the service must be the non-resident entity. It is not mandatory for the income to be taxed in the destination country, as the existence of an information exchange agreement is sufficient. The calculation is based on the days of effective stay during the calendar year.
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the basic requirements of displacement and the non-resident entity. The doctrine has progressively refined the calculation of days of stay and the nature of the recipient entity, especially within corporate groups and subcontracting arrangements. No fundamental changes are observed, but rather an increased specificity in the application of the rule.
Turning points
-
Introduces the need to prove that the service within corporate groups produces an advantage or utility for the non-resident entity according to the LIS (Corporate Income Tax Law).
-
Clarifies that in subcontracting, the requirement is met if the final recipient is the non-resident entity and provides flexibility regarding taxation in the destination country.
Analysis based on 47 of 49 rulings with a stated position. Updated 15 September 2026.