How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Income from employment, the amount or right of which depends on a judicial ruling, is attributed to the period in which said ruling becomes final. If the amount was already determined and there was only a lack of payment, the amounts must be attributed to the fiscal year in which they were due via a supplementary tax return. In the case of owed salaries, the payment made by FOGASA does not alter the rule of attribution to the original year of exigibility.
The DGT's position remains constant regarding the treatment of income subject to judicial ruling, applying the finality of the ruling as the milestone for attribution. The doctrine has clarified the distinction between income whose amount is uncertain (attributed to the finality of the ruling) and salaries already determined but unpaid (attributed to the year of exigibility via a supplementary return). No doctrinal shifts are observed, but rather a repeated application of the criterion of exigibility versus judicial uncertainty.
Turning points
-
Distinguishes between salaries whose amount was already determined (attribution to the year of exigibility) and those whose amount depended on the ruling (attribution to the finality of the ruling).
-
Clarifies that the payment of owed salaries by FOGASA does not modify the obligation to attribute the income to the period in which they were due from the employer.
Analysis based on 66 of 66 rulings with a stated position. Updated 18 September 2026.