How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The 40% reduction on contributions made until December 31, 2006, can only be applied to one of the benefits received as a lump sum derived from the same contingency. The taxpayer is free to choose the tax year in which to apply said reduction, provided that the period established by the twelfth transitional provision of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law) is respected. In cases of early retirement due to collective dismissal, the contingency is understood to have occurred when the requirements for collection are met (termination of employment and unemployment).
The DGT's position remains stable regarding the application of the reduction for contributions made prior to 2007. The evolution focuses on specifying the moment the contingency occurs for the calculation of timeframes, especially in cases of early retirement or exceptional liquidity. Recent rulings confirm that the right to choose the tax year of application remains intact.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the retirement reduction does not prevent its application in another year to death benefits, as these are distinct contingencies.
-
Clarifies that the reduction can only be applied to one of the benefits received as a lump sum derived from the same contingency.
Analysis based on 44 of 48 rulings with a stated position. Updated 23 September 2026.