How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The restitution of amounts due to the nullity of contracts or floor clauses does not constitute income for Personal Income Tax (IRPF) purposes, as it seeks to return to the initial state. If the refunded amounts were used for the deduction for investment in the primary residence, the taxpayer must regularize said deduction in the non-prescribed tax years. Legal interest derived from these refunds is compensatory in nature and is taxed as a capital gain within the savings base.
The DGT's position remains constant throughout the analyzed sequence. The criterion establishes that refunds due to the nullity of loans or clauses are not income, but they require the regularization of the primary residence deduction if it was applied to those amounts. No changes are observed in the doctrine applied to this scenario.
Analysis based on 16 of 17 rulings with a stated position. Updated 25 September 2026.