How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The reduction for compensatory pensions under Article 55 of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law) is only applicable to amounts paid after the finality of the judgment or public deed. The attribution of the use of the dwelling is not considered a compensatory or alimony pension, and therefore does not allow for said reduction. Regarding the regime for alimony annuities, only the amounts fixed in a judicial resolution and effectively paid are admitted.
The DGT's position remains constant in requiring judicial finality for the effects of a regulatory agreement to have tax efficacy. It has been reaffirmed that the attribution of a dwelling is a distinct concept from a compensatory pension and that non-judicial extraordinary expenses do not count towards the special regime.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the attribution of the use of the dwelling is a distinct matter from the compensatory pension and does not allow for the reduction under Article 55 of the LIRPF.
-
Limits the special regime of Articles 64 and 75 to the amount fixed in a judicial resolution and effectively paid, excluding amounts that exceed the agreement.
Analysis based on 25 of 30 rulings with a stated position. Updated 24 September 2026.