How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The 30% reduction for irregular income is not applicable when the amount received is a certain sum that arises ex novo. For irregularity to exist, the amount must represent the substitution or reparation of a salary supplement or a pension of indefinite duration. The reduction does not apply if the concept is not linked to a generation period.
The DGT has moved from considering that compensation for the suppression of indefinite-duration supplements constitutes a notoriously irregular income, to establishing strict limits. The 2024 rulings mark a change by denying the reduction when the payment does not effectively substitute a previous supplement, but rather arises as a new amount.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the reduction is not applicable if the amount arises ex novo and does not represent the substitution or reparation of an indefinite-duration supplement.
Analysis based on 10 of 10 rulings with a stated position. Updated 29 September 2026.