How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
Studies for training or upskilling are not considered benefits in kind if they are financed directly by the employer and are required for the development of activities or the characteristics of the position. If the employer provides money to the worker to acquire the services, the income is considered monetary remuneration. In this latter case, the exemption under article 42.2.a) of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law) is not applicable.
The DGT's position remains constant in requiring three conditions: full financing by the company, training purpose, and requirement by the position. The doctrine has specified that the reimbursement of expenses or the provision of cash denatures the exemption, converting the income into monetary remuneration.
Turning points
-
Establishes that cash grants to reimburse training expenses are monetary earnings, which prevents the application of the training exemption under article 42.2.a) of the LIRPF.
-
Extends the exemption for benefits in kind to the acquisition of books intended for staff updating or upskilling, provided they are required by the position.
Analysis based on 10 of 10 rulings with a stated position. Updated 28 September 2026.