How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The payment made by a guarantor does not constitute an automatic capital loss, but rather generates a credit right against the debtor. The loss is only attributable when said right becomes judicially uncollectible under the assumptions of article 14.2 letter k) of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law). This includes write-offs in insolvency proceedings or the passage of one year in judicial enforcement proceedings without satisfaction of the credit.
The DGT's position remains constant at the core of the criterion: the payment is not an automatic loss but a credit right. The evolution is limited to the precision of the uncollectibility assumptions, detailing in the most recent rulings the specific scenarios of article 14.2 letter k) of the LIRPF.
Turning points
-
Specifies the assumptions of uncollectibility by including the passage of one year in a judicial enforcement proceeding without satisfaction of the credit.
-
Explicitly links the loss to the circumstances of article 14.2 letter k) of the LIRPF, detailing write-offs and insolvency agreements.
Analysis based on 9 of 9 rulings with a stated position. Updated 30 September 2026.