Skip to content
Back to index
V2494-24 9 December 2024 · SG de Impuestos sobre las Personas Jurídicas Criterion in force
IS · fusión inversa

Reverse merger and improper merger between real estate companies qualify for tax neutrality under IS if valid economic reasons exist

A real estate company (Company B) proposes first merging with its parent (Company A, fully owned), followed by absorbing a wholly-owned subsidiary (Company C). The DGT confirms both transactions may benefit from the tax neutrality regime in Chapter VII, Title VII of the LIS, provided they are carried out under Royal Decree-Law 5/2023 and valid economic justifications (such as structural simplification, operational efficiency, and strengthening of real estate activities) are stated. The absorbing company does not recognise income from the cancellation of shares and assumes the tax rights and obligations of the merged entities.

The question raised

Question raised 1. Whether the described transaction may benefit from the tax regime provided for in Chapter VII of Title VII of Law 27/2014, of November 27, on Corporate Income Tax, and whether the reasons set forth are considered economically valid for such purposes.

The DGT's ruling

If the transaction is carried out within a commercial scope and complies with Article 76.1 of the LIS, it may benefit from the tax neutrality regime. This implies that no income from the transfer of assets or the cancellation of shares shall be recognized, and the values and seniority of the assets shall be maintained. The absorbing company shall subrogate into the negative tax bases and deductions of the transferring companies, subject to legal limits. However, the extinction by merger of rights of intra-group loans could generate income in the absorbing company.

Apply this to a real case

What is published here, applied to a company or a specific case. The first meeting is free.

Email
Contact