Doctrine by topic · DGT Observatory

Parent Company: DGT doctrinal evolution

How the DGT's position on this topic has evolved, and the rulings it rests on.

← DGT Observatory

How the DGT's position has evolved

Stable position High confidence 8 rulings · 2014–2017

Current position

The exemption under article 14.1 h) of the TRLIRNR (Non-Resident Income Tax Law) is applicable if the parent company and the subsidiary comply with the requirements of Directive 90/435/EEC, including a minimum holding of 5% for one year. If the parent company is owned by non-EU entities, it must demonstrate valid economic reasons and that it was not established to obtain the exemption. Residence must be proven by means of a tax residence certificate, without the need for an apostille.

The DGT's position remains stable regarding the application of the exemption under the Parent-Subsidiary Directive. Rulings confirm the requirement to demonstrate valid economic reasons when the ultimate ownership is non-EU and specify the requirements for proving residence. No changes in the substance of the criterion have been observed during the analyzed period.

Analysis based on 8 of 8 rulings with a stated position. Updated 2 October 2026.

Rulings on this topic

8
V2200-17 30 Aug 2017

Companies resulting from a total demerger may retain Wealth Tax exemptions

SG de Impuestos Patrimoniales, Tasas y Precios Públicos
escisión totalexenciónactividad económicasociedad matrizreducciones LIP — Ley 19/1991 del Impuesto sobre el Patrimonio art. 4.ochoLISD — Ley 29/1987 de Sucesiones y Donaciones art. 20
Affects CompanyExpat · Non-residentIndividual

Apply this to your case

Non-resident taxationTalk to the team applying this doctrine daily.
Modelo 210 CalculatorEstimate the impact on your case in two minutes.
Talk to the tax teamWe check whether this criterion affects you and what it means in your situation.
Email
Contact