Skip to content

Doctrine by topic · DGT Observatory

Receipt: DGT doctrinal evolution

How the DGT's position on this topic has evolved, and the rulings it rests on.

← DGT Observatory

How the DGT's position has evolved

Settled doctrine High confidence 11 rulings · 2016–2024

Current position

In the delivery of forestry products under the special regime for agriculture, livestock, and fishing, the purchaser must issue a single receipt for the lump-sum compensation. Issuing two receipts for the same transaction with the same recipient is incorrect. The receipt must comply with the requirements of the Billing Regulations to allow for the reimbursement of compensations.

The DGT's position remains constant regarding the nature of the receipt and its function for the reimbursement of compensations. Formal aspects have been specified, such as the substitution of the signature by representatives or electronic means and the uniqueness of the document per transaction. No substantive changes in the application of the regime are observed.

Turning points

  1. V0756-17

    Allows the signature of the taxable person to be replaced by that of their representative, provided that such circumstance is stated on the receipt.

  2. V0771-17

    Authorizes the substitution of the handwritten signature with a digital signature in electronic receipts, guaranteeing authenticity and integrity.

  3. V0580-24

    Establishes that the purchaser must issue a single receipt for the lump-sum compensation, prohibiting the issuance of two receipts for the same transaction.

Analysis based on 10 of 11 rulings with a stated position. Updated 28 September 2026.

Rulings on this topic

11

Apply this to your case

Email
Contact