How the DGT's position has evolved
Current position
The exemption under article 7.p) of the LIRPF (Personal Income Tax Law) requires that the work be performed for a non-resident entity and that the effective beneficiary of the services be said foreign entity. The destination country must apply an analogous tax and must not be a tax haven. The exempt income is not taken into account when determining the obligation to file a tax return according to the limits of article 96 of the LIRPF.
The DGT's position remains stable regarding the substantive requirements of the exemption, such as the non-residency of the entity and the absence of tax havens. Rulings have clarified operational aspects, such as the proportional calculation of non-specific remuneration and the exclusion of exempt income when determining the obligation to file a tax return.
Turning points
-
Establishes that the 60,100 euro limit is not prorated and defines the proportional distribution of non-specific remuneration based on the number of days of displacement.
-
Clarifies that exempt income is not taken into account when determining the obligation to file a tax return according to article 96.
Analysis based on 8 of 8 rulings with a stated position. Updated 12 October 2026.